| Andrew Cooke | Contents | Latest | RSS | Twitter | Previous | Next

C[omp]ute

Welcome to my blog, which was once a mailing list of the same name and is still generated by mail. Please reply via the "comment" links.

Always interested in offers/projects/new ideas. Eclectic experience in fields like: numerical computing; Python web; Java enterprise; functional languages; GPGPU; SQL databases; etc. Based in Santiago, Chile; telecommute worldwide. CV; email.

Personal Projects

Lepl parser for Python.

Colorless Green.

Photography around Santiago.

SVG experiment.

Professional Portfolio

Calibration of seismometers.

Data access via web services.

Cache rewrite.

Extending OpenSSH.

C-ORM: docs, API.

Last 100 entries

Have to add...; Culturally Liberal and Nothing More; Weird Finite / Infinite Result; Your diamond is a beaten up mess; Maths Books; Good Bike Route from Providencia / Las Condes to Panul\; Iain Pears (Author of Complex Plots); Plum Jam; Excellent; More Recently; For a moment I forgot StackOverflow sucked; A Few Weeks On...; Chilean Book Recommendations; How To Write Shared Libraries; Jenny Erpenbeck (Author); Dijkstra, Coins, Tables; Python libraries error on OpenSuse; Deserving Trump; And Smugness; McCloskey Economics Trilogy; cmocka - Mocks for C; Concept Creep (Americans); Futhark - OpenCL Language; Moved / Gone; Fan and USB issues; Burgers in Santiago; The Origin of Icosahedral Symmetry in Viruses; autoenum on PyPI; Jars Explains; Tomato Chutney v3; REST; US Elections and Gender: 24 Point Swing; PPPoE on OpenSuse Leap 42.1; SuperMicro X10SDV-TLN4F/F with Opensuse Leap 42.1; Big Data AI Could Be Very Bad Indeed....; Cornering; Postcapitalism (Paul Mason); Black Science Fiction; Git is not a CDN; Mining of Massive Data Sets; Rachel Kaadzi Ghansah; How great republics meet their end; Raspberry, Strawberry and Banana Jam; Interesting Dead Areas of Math; Later Taste; For Sale; Death By Bean; It's Good!; Tomato Chutney v2; Time ATAC MX 2 Pedals - First Impressions; Online Chilean Crafts; Intellectual Variety; Taste + Texture; Time Invariance and Gauge Symmetry; Jodorowsky; Tomato Chutney; Analysis of Support for Trump; Indian SF; TP-Link TL-WR841N DNS TCP Bug; TP-Link TL-WR841N as Wireless Bridge; Sending Email On Time; Maybe run a command; Sterile Neutrinos; Strawberry and Banana Jam; The Best Of All Possible Worlds; Kenzaburo Oe: The Changeling; Peach Jam; Taste Test; Strawberry and Raspberry Jam; flac to mp3 on OpenSuse 42.1; Also, Sebald; Kenzaburo Oe Interview; Otake (Kitani Minoru) move Black 121; Is free speech in British universities under threat?; I am actually good at computers; Was This Mansplaining?; WebFaction / LetsEncrypt / General Disappointment; Sensible Philosophy of Science; George Ellis; Misplaced Intuition and Online Communities; More Reading About Japan; Visibilty / Public Comments / Domestic Violence; Ferias de Santiago; More (Clearly Deliberate); Deleted Obit Post; And then a 50 yo male posts this...; We Have Both Kinds Of Contributors; Free Springer Books; Books on Religion; Books on Linguistics; Palestinan Electronica; Books In Anthropology; Taylor Expansions of Spacetime; Info on Juniper; Efficient Stream Processing; The Moral Character of Crypto; Hearing Aid Info; Small Success With Go!; Re: Quick message - This link is broken; Adding Reverb To The Echo Chamber; Sox Audio Tools

© 2006-2015 Andrew Cooke (site) / post authors (content).

Earth Explosion

From: "andrew cooke" <andrew@...>

Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 12:16:33 -0300 (CLST)

My take on this question - http://ask.metafilter.com/mefi/31481

In very simple terms, only the mass "inside where you are" generates
gravity.  If you go deep into the earth, gravity would change just as you
would expect for a planet of the size that corresponded to having a
surface where you were (assuming the earth were solid etc).

So going down 1000 miles you'd feel a gravity similar to an "earth" that
had a radius 1000 miles smaller.

Now it seems to me that what the question is asking is - what happens if
we move some of the earth's mass to outside the moon, and everything else
stays the same?

If so, then the answer is probably obvious - the moon would behave as it
would if the earth had a smaller mass (the mass left in the new, smaller
planet).

Exactly what would this behaviour be?

First of all, it would continue to orbit the sun.

Second, relative to the earth, I think (and I'm guesing - I'd need to do
the maths, or at least think harder, to be sure, and I'm in a hurry) that
the orbital period would increase (more time between full moons) and the
average earth-moon distance would increase.

Exactly how the earth-moon distance would increase depends on the way the
weight is lost.  If it were lost rapidly then the moon would end up in an
eliptical orbit, with the closest point being the same as now.  If it were
lost gradually, I suspect you'd keep a circular orbit.

An intereesting consequence of the changing period is that the moon would
not necessarily continue to spin so that we always see the same side of
the moon.  Again, this probably depends on the rate of loss of mass.  If
mass were lost very slowly from the earth tidal interactions might keep
the moon "facing us".

However, something that makes me think I may be wrong above.  I'd also
expect the earth's orbit around the sun to change, with years becoming
longer and the earth-sun distance increasing.  That's from the same
arguments (potential energy decreases, kinetic stays the same) as I used
to think about the moon/earth relationship.

Now that sounds OK.  But I *also* thought that various (? at least one?)
asteroid belts coresponded to the positions of old, "broken" planets. 
This seems to be inconsistent with the argument above.

So something seems incorrect.

Andrew

Comment on this post