| Andrew Cooke | Contents | Latest | RSS | Twitter | Previous | Next

C[omp]ute

Welcome to my blog, which was once a mailing list of the same name and is still generated by mail. Please reply via the "comment" links.

Always interested in offers/projects/new ideas. Eclectic experience in fields like: numerical computing; Python web; Java enterprise; functional languages; GPGPU; SQL databases; etc. Based in Santiago, Chile; telecommute worldwide. CV; email.

Personal Projects

Lepl parser for Python.

Colorless Green.

Photography around Santiago.

SVG experiment.

Professional Portfolio

Calibration of seismometers.

Data access via web services.

Cache rewrite.

Extending OpenSSH.

C-ORM: docs, API.

Last 100 entries

OpenSuse 42.2 and Synaptics Touch-Pads; Telephone System Quotes for Cat Soft LLC; Even; Cherry Jam; Lebanese Writer Amin Maalouf; Learning From Trump; Chinese Writer Hu Fayun; C++ - it's the language of the future; And; Apricot Jam; Also; Excellent Article on USA Politics; Oh Metafilter; Prejudice Against The Rurals; Also, Zizek; Trump; Why Trump Won; Doxygen + Latex on CentOS 6; SMASH - Solve 5 Biggest Problems in Physics; Good article on racism, brexit, and social divides; Grandaddy are back!; Consciousness From Max Entropy; Democrats; Harvard Will Fix Black Poverty; Modelling Bicycle Wheels; Amusing Polling Outlier; If Labour keeps telling working class people...; Populism and Choice; Books on Defeat; Enrique Ferrari - Argentine Author; Transcript of German Scientists on Learning of Hiroshima; Calvert Journal; Owen Jones on Twitter; Possible Japanese Authors; Complex American Literature; Chutney v5; Weird Componentized Virus; Interesting Argentinian Author - Antonio Di Benedetto; Useful Thread on MetaPhysics; RAND on fighting online anarchy (2001); NSA Hacked; Very Good LRB Article on Brexit; Nussbaum on Anger; Tasting; Apple + Kiwi Jam; Hit Me; Sudoku - CSP + Chaos; Recycling Electronics In Santiago; Vector Displays in OpenGL; And Anti-Aliased; OpenGL - Render via Intermediate Texture; And Garmin Connect; Using Garmin Forerunner 230 With Linux; (Beating Dead Horse) StackOverflow; Current State of Justice in China; Axiom of Determinacy; Ewww; Fee Chaos Book; Course on Differential Geometry; Okay, but...; Sparse Matrices, Deep Learning; Sounds Bad; Applebaum Rape; Tomato Chutney v4; Have to add...; Culturally Liberal and Nothing More; Weird Finite / Infinite Result; Your diamond is a beaten up mess; Maths Books; Good Bike Route from Providencia / Las Condes to Panul; Iain Pears (Author of Complex Plots); Plum Jam; Excellent; More Recently; For a moment I forgot StackOverflow sucked; A Few Weeks On...; Chilean Book Recommendations; How To Write Shared Libraries; Jenny Erpenbeck (Author); Dijkstra, Coins, Tables; Python libraries error on OpenSuse; Deserving Trump; And Smugness; McCloskey Economics Trilogy; cmocka - Mocks for C; Concept Creep (Americans); Futhark - OpenCL Language; Moved / Gone; Fan and USB issues; Burgers in Santiago; The Origin of Icosahedral Symmetry in Viruses; autoenum on PyPI; Jars Explains; Tomato Chutney v3; REST; US Elections and Gender: 24 Point Swing; PPPoE on OpenSuse Leap 42.1; SuperMicro X10SDV-TLN4F/F with Opensuse Leap 42.1; Big Data AI Could Be Very Bad Indeed....; Cornering; Postcapitalism (Paul Mason)

© 2006-2015 Andrew Cooke (site) / post authors (content).

Efficient Collision Detection with Pessimistic Measures

From: "andrew cooke" <andrew@...>

Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 16:16:32 -0400 (CLT)

I'm modelling a set of colliding lines (rods in 2D) and using Napito to
plot their trajectories.

Modelling individual lines is easy; the problem is reliably detecting
collisions.  In particular, I need to find the *first* collision amongst
all lines (since the movements change after a collision I am simply
restarting after that point - a future optimisation might do something
more sophisticated).

So this is some kind of search.  The trouble is that I don't have an
analytic solution for collisions.  Instead I have a fairly efficient but
pessimistic (it may give false positives) method for determining whether
any two lines touch within a given interval and an iterative method for
determining the time of intersection within some interval that is only
reliable in the limit of small intervals.

Finding the first possible pair of lines ("candidates") is easy - just use
the pessimistic method over progressively smaller time intervals.  But the
"limit of small intervals" makes everything uncertain and possibly
expensive - if you narrow down on an interval to search, and then find
that that it was unsuccessful (which is possible, since the initial
process is pessimistic), then what do you do?  It seems that you are
forced into a fairly detailed systematic search over time (and of
necessarily small intervals).

Fortunately, I can implement the candidate test in a way that makes it
progressively less pessimistic as the time interval decreases (it's
asymptotically correct).  So an explicit search is not that expensive. 
What becomes an issue then is the efficient broadening of the search to
include other candidates if the initial "best" fails.

This suggests that the best approach is to use a depth first search in
time (consider the tree that successively divides intervals in half),
discarding lines when they are not part of the overlapping group as you
descend, pruning when there are no candidates, and using the iterative
method as a test only at the very bottom "leaf" intervals.

In retrospect that seems obvious, but it's taken me a heck of a time to
see it clearly.  I keep being tempted to use the iterative method sooner
(when it works it converges rapidly, but when it fails I am left with no
way to fold that knowledge back into the search).

I guess there may be a future optimisation which uses the iterative
approach in some kind of speculative manner.  Perhaps when I am more
confident about its properties (it's just an analytic solution to a linear
approximation).

Andrew

Subtle, but Correct (I Hope)

From: "andrew cooke" <andrew@...>

Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 17:27:17 -0400 (CLT)

I forgot to mention an additional concern.  It's not really a concern,
since I think the previous argument is correct, but it was one reason I
took so long to get this clear.

Since the initial restriction is pessimistic you may, for any finite
interval, be "blocked" from finding a correct pair of colliding the lines
by the presence of one or more "confusing" lines, which are incorrectly
included.

This is resolved by searching all time ranges in progressively smaller
intervals and relying on the asymptotically correct behaviour to
eventually weed out the confusion.

What I had been trying to do, without much success, was remove the
confusion by pushing information back "up" the search tree.

Andrew

Comment on this post