| Andrew Cooke | Contents | Latest | RSS | Twitter | Previous | Next


Welcome to my blog, which was once a mailing list of the same name and is still generated by mail. Please reply via the "comment" links.

Always interested in offers/projects/new ideas. Eclectic experience in fields like: numerical computing; Python web; Java enterprise; functional languages; GPGPU; SQL databases; etc. Based in Santiago, Chile; telecommute worldwide. CV; email.

Personal Projects

Lepl parser for Python.

Colorless Green.

Photography around Santiago.

SVG experiment.

Professional Portfolio

Calibration of seismometers.

Data access via web services.

Cache rewrite.

Extending OpenSSH.

C-ORM: docs, API.

Last 100 entries

Have to add...; Culturally Liberal and Nothing More; Weird Finite / Infinite Result; Your diamond is a beaten up mess; Maths Books; Good Bike Route from Providencia / Las Condes to Panul\; Iain Pears (Author of Complex Plots); Plum Jam; Excellent; More Recently; For a moment I forgot StackOverflow sucked; A Few Weeks On...; Chilean Book Recommendations; How To Write Shared Libraries; Jenny Erpenbeck (Author); Dijkstra, Coins, Tables; Python libraries error on OpenSuse; Deserving Trump; And Smugness; McCloskey Economics Trilogy; cmocka - Mocks for C; Concept Creep (Americans); Futhark - OpenCL Language; Moved / Gone; Fan and USB issues; Burgers in Santiago; The Origin of Icosahedral Symmetry in Viruses; autoenum on PyPI; Jars Explains; Tomato Chutney v3; REST; US Elections and Gender: 24 Point Swing; PPPoE on OpenSuse Leap 42.1; SuperMicro X10SDV-TLN4F/F with Opensuse Leap 42.1; Big Data AI Could Be Very Bad Indeed....; Cornering; Postcapitalism (Paul Mason); Black Science Fiction; Git is not a CDN; Mining of Massive Data Sets; Rachel Kaadzi Ghansah; How great republics meet their end; Raspberry, Strawberry and Banana Jam; Interesting Dead Areas of Math; Later Taste; For Sale; Death By Bean; It's Good!; Tomato Chutney v2; Time ATAC MX 2 Pedals - First Impressions; Online Chilean Crafts; Intellectual Variety; Taste + Texture; Time Invariance and Gauge Symmetry; Jodorowsky; Tomato Chutney; Analysis of Support for Trump; Indian SF; TP-Link TL-WR841N DNS TCP Bug; TP-Link TL-WR841N as Wireless Bridge; Sending Email On Time; Maybe run a command; Sterile Neutrinos; Strawberry and Banana Jam; The Best Of All Possible Worlds; Kenzaburo Oe: The Changeling; Peach Jam; Taste Test; Strawberry and Raspberry Jam; flac to mp3 on OpenSuse 42.1; Also, Sebald; Kenzaburo Oe Interview; Otake (Kitani Minoru) move Black 121; Is free speech in British universities under threat?; I am actually good at computers; Was This Mansplaining?; WebFaction / LetsEncrypt / General Disappointment; Sensible Philosophy of Science; George Ellis; Misplaced Intuition and Online Communities; More Reading About Japan; Visibilty / Public Comments / Domestic Violence; Ferias de Santiago; More (Clearly Deliberate); Deleted Obit Post; And then a 50 yo male posts this...; We Have Both Kinds Of Contributors; Free Springer Books; Books on Religion; Books on Linguistics; Palestinan Electronica; Books In Anthropology; Taylor Expansions of Spacetime; Info on Juniper; Efficient Stream Processing; The Moral Character of Crypto; Hearing Aid Info; Small Success With Go!; Re: Quick message - This link is broken; Adding Reverb To The Echo Chamber; Sox Audio Tools

© 2006-2015 Andrew Cooke (site) / post authors (content).


From: "andrew cooke" <andrew@...>

Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 09:00:43 -0400 (CLT)


"Political filter: Question about libertarian belief and the government vs
big business ..."

I think the only way to explain it is to look at the social context -
libertarianism is popular only (as far as I know) within the USA and is
strongly influenced by the culture there. So i don't think it's surprising
that a reasonable explanation involves some aspect of American culture.

It is useful to compare libertarianism with anarchism, which questions all
power structures. For me, at least, anarchism is logically consistent in
the way you seem to expect in your question.

Now i don't for a minute claim that libertarianism evolved from anarchism,
but i think it helps to understand libertarianism if you consider it as an
"American anarchism" and then ask "why the differences?".

And if you do that the biggest difference, by far, is the point you
identified - that libertarianism does not seem to be concerned about
"commerical" power structures.

(So far i think i have been relatively neutral; perhaps this next part I
more personal) it seems to me that this difference can be explained by the
"players" involved and a certain amount of "self-reenforcement". In Europe
anarchism is a much smaller movement than American libertarianism. In a
way it is doomed to be so, because any anarchical organisation immediately
generates stressed since it is, itself, a power structure.

In contrast, American libertarianism, by focusing attention only on the
power of governments (something that is a concern in wider American
society anyway, which make such an approach initially possible) removes
this "self destructive" attitude and opens up a channel for funding.

So by "modifying" anarchism in this way (again, this is just conceptual -
I am not saying this was the actual way in which libertarianism started)
libertarianism becomes a much more practically viable idealism, even if it
no longer has the kind of consistency or moral authority/absolutism that
comes with anarchism. And that "modification" is a particularly American
one - no other country hates the idea of government so.

The result is a political idealism that works in practice, even if it
makes little logical sense (and I don't think it's unduly cynical to say
that most people do not look for logic in politics anyway - it's all about
image, rhetoric, identification, etc).


[Fwd: Andrew On Libertarianism]

From: "andrew cooke" <andrew@...>

Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 14:09:13 -0400 (CLT)

---------------------------- Original Message ----------------------------
Subject: Andrew On Libertarianism
From:    "Craig Bolton"
Date:    Sat, August 18, 2007 11:53 am
To:      compute-Libertaria0@...

Andrew's post contains so many historical and logical confusions that it
is difficult to know where to begin. But perhaps a few overview comments
will do for a start:

(1) The historical origins of libertarianism are not that mysterious.
Libertarianism is but the latest manifestation of the ideological brew
that emerged in the 16th Century in Holland, moved to England in the 17th
Century and to the U.S. in the 18th Century. The best known manifestation
of this phenomenon is called "classical liberalism," but there were other
manifestations at other points in time and places [the older form, for
instance, was called "radical Enlightenment"]. Andrew should look up those
references if he is still confused.

(2) I don't know what form of libertarianism Andrew has bumped up against,
but his experience is obviously not extensive. Libertarians run the
spectrum from "individualist anarchists" to strict construction
constitutionalists to natural rights theorists. A fairly good survey of
20th Century libertarianism in the U.S. is the recently published Radicals
For Capitalism by Brian Doherty, which Andrew should read if he wants to
become minimally better informed on this topic.

(3) Andrews use of the term "power" is ambiguous and misplaced. "Power" as
he is using the term seems to be a social or financial concept.
Libertarianism is not a form of sociology or finance, it is a POLITICAL
ideology. It deals strictly with the traditional issues of political
philosophy - what is the basis of allegiance to a state, what is the
proper scope of state action, what is the proper constitution of a state,
etc. "Liberty" as used by libertarians is also the traditional "liberty
vs. tyranny," it is not whether or not you have a higher I.Q. or more
income and thus more life options. Libertarianism is related to certain
forms of economic theory, but those forms rest upon the premise of
competition between producers and sellers, not on businesses "doing
whatever they want."

Comment on this post