| Andrew Cooke | Contents | Latest | RSS | Twitter | Previous | Next


Welcome to my blog, which was once a mailing list of the same name and is still generated by mail. Please reply via the "comment" links.

Always interested in offers/projects/new ideas. Eclectic experience in fields like: numerical computing; Python web; Java enterprise; functional languages; GPGPU; SQL databases; etc. Based in Santiago, Chile; telecommute worldwide. CV; email.

Personal Projects

Lepl parser for Python.

Colorless Green.

Photography around Santiago.

SVG experiment.

Professional Portfolio

Calibration of seismometers.

Data access via web services.

Cache rewrite.

Extending OpenSSH.

C-ORM: docs, API.

Last 100 entries

China Gamifies Real Life; Can't Help Thinking It's Thoughtcrime; Mefi Quotes; Spray Painting Bike Frame; Weeks 10 + 11; Change: No Longer Possible To Merge Metadata; Books on Old Age; Health Tree Maps; MRA - Men's Rights Activists; Writing Good C++14; Risk Assessment - Fukushima; The Future of Advertising and Surveillance; Travelling With Betaferon; I think I know what I dislike so much about Metafilter; Weeks 8 + 9; More; Pastamore - Bad Italian in Vitacura; History Books; Iraq + The (UK) Governing Elite; Answering Some Hard Questions; Pinochet: The Dictator's Shadow; An Outsider's Guide To Julia Packages; Nobody gives a shit; Lepton Decay Irregularity; An Easier Way; Julia's BinDeps (aka How To Install Cairo); Good Example Of Good Police Work (And Anonymity Being Hard); Best Santiago Burgers; Also; Michael Emmerich (Vibrator Translator) Interview (Japanese Books); Clarice Lispector (Brazillian Writer); Books On Evolution; Looks like Ara (Modular Phone) is dead; Index - Translations From Chile; More Emotion in Chilean Wines; Week 7; Aeon Magazine (Science-ish); QM, Deutsch, Constructor Theory; Interesting Talk Transcripts; Interesting Suggestion Of Election Fraud; "Hard" Books; Articles or Papers on depolarizing the US; Textbook for "QM as complex probabilities"; SFO Get Libor Trader (14 years); Why Are There Still So Many Jobs?; Navier Stokes Incomplete; More on Benford; FBI Claimed Vandalism; Architectural Tessellation; Also: Go, Blake's 7; Delusions of Gender (book); Crypto AG DID work with NSA / GCHQ; UNUMS (Universal Number Format); MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses); Interesting Looking Game; Euler's Theorem for Polynomials; Weeks 3-6; Reddit Comment; Differential Cryptanalysis For Dummies; Japanese Graphic Design; Books To Be Re-Read; And Today I Learned Bugs Need Clear Examples; Factoring a 67 bit prime in your head; Islamic Geometric Art; Useful Julia Backtraces from Tasks; Nothing, however, is lost with less discomfort than that which, when lost, cannot be missed; Article on Didion; Cost of Living by City; British Slavery; Derrida on Metaphor; African SciFi; Traits in Julia; Alternative Japanese Lit; Pulic Key as Address (Snow); Why Information Grows; The Blindness Of The Chilean Elite; Some Victoriagate Links; This Is Why I Left StackOverflow; New TLS Implementation; Maths for Physicists; How I Am 8; 1000 Word Philosophy; Cyberpunk Reading List; Detailed Discussion of Message Dispatch in ParserCombinator Library for Julia; FizzBuzz in Julia w Dependent Types; kokko - Design Shop in Osaka; Summary of Greece, Currently; LLVM and GPUs; See Also; Schoolgirl Groyps (Maths); Japanese Lit; Another Example - Modular Arithmetic; Music from United; Python 2 and 3 compatible alternative.; Read Agatha Christie for the Plot; A Constructive Look at TempleOS; Music Thread w Many Recommendations; Fixed Version; A Useful Julia Macro To Define Equality And Hash; k3b cdrom access, OpenSuse 13.1; Week 2

© 2006-2015 Andrew Cooke (site) / post authors (content).

QAMA Calculator - Review

From: andrew cooke <andrew@...>

Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 19:19:30 -0400

I just received my QAMA calculator.  A big thanks to the creators for shipping
to Chile - I know not everyone from the USA will.

If you have no idea what I'm talking about - the QAMA is a calculator that
won't give you the answer to a calculation until you guess "close enough".


The main positive is that it does exactly what it's supposed to do: it
requires a guess; the guess has to be close; "close" depends on the
calculation and seems relatively fair (given I am not so great at logs or

The negatives are generally small UI details, and probably not too surprising
in a "first release":

 - The buttons are not so sensitive / positive.  Sometimes I am not sure if
   I've pressed something or not; sometimes I'm surprised to find a digit
   missing (and the buttons are not the grey rubber you might expect from the
   photo on the site, but a harder, textured plastic).

 - There's a battery "bulge" along the top of the back.  This makes it easier
   to use (raising the back slightly and making the display - which is not as
   contrasty as some - easier to read).  So maybe it's not a negative.

 - The "del" button deletes where the cursor is.  Perhaps this is normal in
   modern calculators (my old things, that I have had for 20+ years, don't
   display the entire expression and have no way of editing), but it means
   that backspacing on an error takes two key-presses (now that I write this
   it seems so odd I wonder if I have missed something - please post a
   correction if so).

 - The button labelled "1/x" is actually "^-1".  That's not a tautology - it
   requires a different order (1/2 is "2" then "^-1", not "1/x" then "2").
   And while talking of button labels - they are kind of ungainly, or poorly
   spaced, in a way I can't describe, but which reminds me of old web pages
   (something like this blog, except Helvetica...)

 - The "0" and "." are swapped for me (the two calculators I have to hand both
   have the "." to the right of the "0", while the QAMA has the "." to the
   left).  This may be a UK/USA thing.  It is annoying.

And one more "philosophical" objection, which I guess most people will feel is
a positive: if you enable the "cheat" mode (no need to guess) then red lights
on the keyboard flash.  At four different points.  In a random order.  In
locations obviously designed to be difficult to cover if you are an
embarrassed child.

Which, to me, is trying a little too hard.

Now, I don't have kids.  And the people I know with kids all thought this was
a marvellous idea (I guess they don't trust their little darlings any more
than I do).  But - and I know it may sound daft - it changed completely how I
felt about the device: it switched from "fun" to a machine designed to
"improve" the "target" (whether they want improving or not).

Fair enough, I guess.  Hopefully my resentment will fall back and the fun will
return.  Then, if I can find a way to make the buttons press reliably, I hope
to use it more.  It certainly looks cool in a low-tech hi-tech way.


PS The screen *is* covered by a plastic peel-off.  It felt very much like I
might be trying to remove an integral part of the display.  Persevere and you
get a scratch-free window...

Comment on this post