C[omp]ute

Welcome to my blog, which was once a mailing list of the same name and is still generated by mail. Please reply via the "comment" links.

Always interested in offers/projects/new ideas. Eclectic experience in fields like: numerical computing; Python web; Java enterprise; functional languages; GPGPU; SQL databases; etc. Based in Santiago, Chile; telecommute worldwide. CV; email.

© 2006-2017 Andrew Cooke (site) / post authors (content).

Reinventing Physics - the Search for the Real Frontier

From: "andrew cooke" <andrew@...>

Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 23:06:22 -0300 (CLST)

Last July I mentioned relating fundamental (quantum) physics to
information theory (and I think I posted a link to a paper on the same
subject a while before that).  In some sense, then, it's possible that
laws about information are the basis for physics.

http://chronicle.com/temp/reprint.php?id=nmsi7ebjjeu402lhjrlke4ae7wxpakvx
- I wondered if the author was thinking along similar lines.  Then I found
his Nobel Prize acceptance speech -
http://nobelprize.org/physics/laureates/1998/laughlin-lecture.pdf - which
discusses emergent properties of quantum mechanical systems and, from what
I understand (it starts of nice and easy, but gets stickier), that's not
his point.  But maybe there is a connection?  I wish someone smarter than
me would tell me the answer.  Anyway, both those articles are interesting,
and his book - now published
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/046503828X - might be worth

And finally, which I should have mentioned earlier, the reason I started
with the article is because he is arguing against the assumption that
physics is "almost done" (which I believe likely).  So there's some kind
of claim that emergent properties are the next big area of physics.  I'm a
bit sceptical, because he comes from materials science, which is
complicated, and you could argue that this is "complicated like chemistry"
(ie it's not *fundamental* physics, but rather the difficult details you
build on top of that).  I think his counterclaim is that in fact the
emergent properties turn out to be the fundamental ones.  Maybe it's
clearer in the book.

Andrew

--
__ _ __ ___  ___| |_____   work web site: http://www.ctio.noao.edu/~andrew
/ _ / _/ _ \/ _ \ / / -_)  personal web site: http://www.acooke.org
\__,_\__\___/\___/_\_\___|  list: http://www.acooke.org/cute

_______________________________________________
compute mailing list
compute@...
https://acooke.dyndns.org/mailman/listinfo/compute