| Andrew Cooke | Contents | Latest | RSS | Twitter | Previous | Next

C[omp]ute

Welcome to my blog, which was once a mailing list of the same name and is still generated by mail. Please reply via the "comment" links.

Always interested in offers/projects/new ideas. Eclectic experience in fields like: numerical computing; Python web; Java enterprise; functional languages; GPGPU; SQL databases; etc. Based in Santiago, Chile; telecommute worldwide. CV; email.

Personal Projects

Lepl parser for Python.

Colorless Green.

Photography around Santiago.

SVG experiment.

Professional Portfolio

Calibration of seismometers.

Data access via web services.

Cache rewrite.

Extending OpenSSH.

C-ORM: docs, API.

Last 100 entries

Crypto AG DID work with NSA / GCHQ; UNUMS (Universal Number Format); MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses); Interesting Looking Game; Euler's Theorem for Polynomials; Weeks 3-6; Reddit Comment; Differential Cryptanalysis For Dummies; Japanese Graphic Design; Books To Be Re-Read; And Today I Learned Bugs Need Clear Examples; Factoring a 67 bit prime in your head; Islamic Geometric Art; Useful Julia Backtraces from Tasks; Nothing, however, is lost with less discomfort than that which, when lost, cannot be missed; Article on Didion; Cost of Living by City; British Slavery; Derrida on Metaphor; African SciFi; Traits in Julia; Alternative Japanese Lit; Pulic Key as Address (Snow); Why Information Grows; The Blindness Of The Chilean Elite; Some Victoriagate Links; This Is Why I Left StackOverflow; New TLS Implementation; Maths for Physicists; How I Am 8; 1000 Word Philosophy; Cyberpunk Reading List; Detailed Discussion of Message Dispatch in ParserCombinator Library for Julia; FizzBuzz in Julia w Dependent Types; kokko - Design Shop in Osaka; Summary of Greece, Currently; LLVM and GPUs; See Also; Schoolgirl Groyps (Maths); Japanese Lit; Another Example - Modular Arithmetic; Music from United; Python 2 and 3 compatible alternative.; Read Agatha Christie for the Plot; A Constructive Look at TempleOS; Music Thread w Many Recommendations; Fixed Version; A Useful Julia Macro To Define Equality And Hash; k3b cdrom access, OpenSuse 13.1; Week 2; From outside, the UK looks less than stellar; Huge Fonts in VirtualBox; Keen - Complex Emergencies; The Fallen of World War II; Some Spanish Fiction; Calling C From Fortran 95; Bjork DJ Set; Z3 Example With Python; Week 1; Useful Guide To Starting With IJulia; UK Election + Media; Review: Reinventing Organizations; Inline Assembly With Julia / LLVM; Against the definition of types; Dumb Crypto Paper; The Search For Quasi-Periodicity...; Is There An Alternative To Processing?; CARDIAC (CARDboard Illustrative Aid to Computation); The Bolivian Case Against Chile At The Hague; Clear, Cogent Economic Arguments For Immigration; A Program To Say If I Am Working; Decent Cards For Ill People; New Photo; Luksic And Barrick Gold; President Bachelet's Speech; Baltimore Primer; libxml2 Parsing Stream; configure.ac Recipe For Library Path; The Davalos Affair For Idiots; Not The Onion: Google Fireside Chat w Kissinger; Bicycle Wheels, Inertia, and Energy; Another Tax Fraud; Google's Borg; A Verion That Redirects To Local HTTP Server; Spanish Accents For Idiots; Aluminium Cans; Advice on Spray Painting; Female View of Online Chat From a Male; UX Reading List; S4 Subgroups - Geometric Interpretation; Fucking Email; The SQM Affair For Idiots; Using Kolmogorov Complexity; Oblique Strategies in bash; Curses Tools; Markov Chain Monte Carlo Without all the Bullshit; Email Para Matias Godoy Mercado; The Penta Affair For Idiots; Example Code To Create numpy Array in C; Good Article on Bias in Graphic Design (NYTimes); Do You Backup github?

© 2006-2015 Andrew Cooke (site) / post authors (content).

Simple Schema for Describing Tests

From: "andrew cooke" <andrew@...>

Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 21:43:24 -0300 (CLST)

I've been meaning to write some notes about tests for a while now.
Unfortunately I keep thinking of different things, and then forgetting
them.  So I will probably add more comments here over time.

But my main idea, which I don't expect to change, is that there's a lot of
confusion about tests because they can be viewed in several different
ways, and terminology associated with testing is often associated with a
particular viewpoint.  Worse, sometimes the same terminology means
different things depending on the viewpoint chose.

The three viewpoints I currently have on my list (entries to this list are
some of the things I keep forgetting) are:
- Extent
- Support
- Process

The EXTENT of a test can vary from a single class to a whole system.  A
common intermediate point is to test all related code for a single layer
or language (for example, testing Java code with mocks for the database,
user input, etc).

By SUPPORT I mean the infrastructure used to perform the tests.  JUnit,
for example, or Fitnesse.  Those two show how support can be related both
to extent (JUnit was originally intended for unit tests - single classes)
and process (Fitnesse was originally intended for acceptance tests).

Tests occur within the development PROCESS (whether it's explicit or
not!).  This is related to the "aim" of the test - whether it is for
developers to be check their code, make contracts explicit, or integrate
classes, or for customers to decide whether the product meets their
requirements.

Let's take some examples:

Unit tests
- extent is a single class (well, sometimes a handful...)
- support is FooUnit (depending on the langauage)
- process is development (guiding implementation, making contracts explicit)

Regression tests
- extent is typically a single test, but may extend to a complex system
- support is likely FooUnit plus an automated build
- process is development/test (tickling bugs, fixing them, and making
  sure they stay fixed)

Acceptance tests
- extent is usually the whole system (or as large a portion as possible)
- support may be Fitnesse and/or GUI test tools
- process is customer acceptance

In practice, of course, every project is different and should be tested
appropriately.  What I am trying to do here is not give a fixed set of
tests, but provide a framework within which we can describe "what we are
doing", so that everyone is on the same page.  My hope is that
focussing(*) extent, support and process makes that easier - rather than
say "do unit tests" we should be saying "do tests with extent X and
support Y for process Z".

Andrew

(*) Is there some way to make Firefox use British spelling when it checks?
 My OED says that focussing is perfectly OK!

Another Test Example

From: "andrew cooke" <andrew@...>

Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 10:38:21 -0300 (CLST)

Here's another example.  I am writing integration tests for a web
application using Spring's MVC.  Since I'm using Spring I can do this from
within Java, using the AbstractTransactionalDataSourceSpringContextTests
class, which extends JUnit.

So the extent of the classes is pretty much the whole system, the process
is integration testing (making sure everything works together), and the
technology is Spring/JUnit.

I think this is a good example, because the technology includes JUnit,
which means that someone is going to refer to these as "unit tests". 
That's the kind of confusion that arises from not specifying clearly the
extent/process (and it's easy to see why it happens - when you're
surrounded by the details of programming it's easy to lose site of the
"big picture").

Andrew

Comment on this post