| Andrew Cooke | Contents | Latest | RSS | Twitter | Previous | Next


Welcome to my blog, which was once a mailing list of the same name and is still generated by mail. Please reply via the "comment" links.

Always interested in offers/projects/new ideas. Eclectic experience in fields like: numerical computing; Python web; Java enterprise; functional languages; GPGPU; SQL databases; etc. Based in Santiago, Chile; telecommute worldwide. CV; email.

Personal Projects

Lepl parser for Python.

Colorless Green.

Photography around Santiago.

SVG experiment.

Professional Portfolio

Calibration of seismometers.

Data access via web services.

Cache rewrite.

Extending OpenSSH.

C-ORM: docs, API.

Last 100 entries

China Gamifies Real Life; Can't Help Thinking It's Thoughtcrime; Mefi Quotes; Spray Painting Bike Frame; Weeks 10 + 11; Change: No Longer Possible To Merge Metadata; Books on Old Age; Health Tree Maps; MRA - Men's Rights Activists; Writing Good C++14; Risk Assessment - Fukushima; The Future of Advertising and Surveillance; Travelling With Betaferon; I think I know what I dislike so much about Metafilter; Weeks 8 + 9; More; Pastamore - Bad Italian in Vitacura; History Books; Iraq + The (UK) Governing Elite; Answering Some Hard Questions; Pinochet: The Dictator's Shadow; An Outsider's Guide To Julia Packages; Nobody gives a shit; Lepton Decay Irregularity; An Easier Way; Julia's BinDeps (aka How To Install Cairo); Good Example Of Good Police Work (And Anonymity Being Hard); Best Santiago Burgers; Also; Michael Emmerich (Vibrator Translator) Interview (Japanese Books); Clarice Lispector (Brazillian Writer); Books On Evolution; Looks like Ara (Modular Phone) is dead; Index - Translations From Chile; More Emotion in Chilean Wines; Week 7; Aeon Magazine (Science-ish); QM, Deutsch, Constructor Theory; Interesting Talk Transcripts; Interesting Suggestion Of Election Fraud; "Hard" Books; Articles or Papers on depolarizing the US; Textbook for "QM as complex probabilities"; SFO Get Libor Trader (14 years); Why Are There Still So Many Jobs?; Navier Stokes Incomplete; More on Benford; FBI Claimed Vandalism; Architectural Tessellation; Also: Go, Blake's 7; Delusions of Gender (book); Crypto AG DID work with NSA / GCHQ; UNUMS (Universal Number Format); MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses); Interesting Looking Game; Euler's Theorem for Polynomials; Weeks 3-6; Reddit Comment; Differential Cryptanalysis For Dummies; Japanese Graphic Design; Books To Be Re-Read; And Today I Learned Bugs Need Clear Examples; Factoring a 67 bit prime in your head; Islamic Geometric Art; Useful Julia Backtraces from Tasks; Nothing, however, is lost with less discomfort than that which, when lost, cannot be missed; Article on Didion; Cost of Living by City; British Slavery; Derrida on Metaphor; African SciFi; Traits in Julia; Alternative Japanese Lit; Pulic Key as Address (Snow); Why Information Grows; The Blindness Of The Chilean Elite; Some Victoriagate Links; This Is Why I Left StackOverflow; New TLS Implementation; Maths for Physicists; How I Am 8; 1000 Word Philosophy; Cyberpunk Reading List; Detailed Discussion of Message Dispatch in ParserCombinator Library for Julia; FizzBuzz in Julia w Dependent Types; kokko - Design Shop in Osaka; Summary of Greece, Currently; LLVM and GPUs; See Also; Schoolgirl Groyps (Maths); Japanese Lit; Another Example - Modular Arithmetic; Music from United; Python 2 and 3 compatible alternative.; Read Agatha Christie for the Plot; A Constructive Look at TempleOS; Music Thread w Many Recommendations; Fixed Version; A Useful Julia Macro To Define Equality And Hash; k3b cdrom access, OpenSuse 13.1; Week 2

© 2006-2015 Andrew Cooke (site) / post authors (content).

StackOverflow and "Show your work"

From: andrew cooke <andrew@...>

Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2012 17:01:32 -0300

Sometimes (I am not sure exactly why, and I am not sure I want to know, since
I suspect it is related to needs I would rather not admit to) I spend time on

StackOverflow is a strange place and I find some users frustrating.


 a people who ask questions that are not very interesting;
 b people who phrase questions so poorly that you need to expend considerable 
   effort to understand what is needed;
 c people who argue for their own confused view of the world, rather than
   tring to understand what is important in the answer given;
 d people who ask questions so simple that is hard to imagine how anyone 
   could have difficulty with them (homework questions, particularly);
 e people who confuse their opinion with fact (particularly bad with smart 
   people whose facts are correct, as they then assume that their opinions 
   are equally solid);
 f people who react to (d) by requesting that "effort is shown".

The last is worst of all.  I do understand the annoyance with (d) - it seems
somehow unfair that stupid or lazy people should have their homework done by
others.  But really, it's not so bad - at some point these people become
irrelevant: they are learning (I do not claim to understand how every person
learns - maybe asking dumb questions is useful for them), or going to leave
the industry, or will fail miserably at some later point.  So simply answer
the question if it looks like fun; there's no moral responsibility to
castigate them and there's certainly no compunction to somehow force them to
learn (quite the reverse - it seems much more just, to me, to feed them easy
answers now, because future failure will be all the harder).

And, worse still, (f) seems to be spreading to all answers.  When an
established member of the site asks a question some people will demand to "see
what you have tried".  Maybe I am projecting terribly here, but it's hard not
to see these people trapped in the classroom, fighting desperately for
validation, believing the questioners rivals who will somehow get praise that
was justly theirs.  Eww.


Re: StackOverflow and "Show your work"

From: Michiel Buddingh' <michiel@...>

Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 08:28:58 +0100

Haven't been on StackOverflow for ages, but your description of its
issues is spot on.  Another annoyance of mine (that I'm guilty of
myself at times) is "good advice".  "You don't want to implement a
checksum algorithm by yourself."  "Never use goto like this."
  Since this kind of advice is mostly sensible, it gets upvoted, but
it tends to completely ignore the possibility that the person who
asked the question is doing something for fun, or wants to learn
something by doing.  I also think these 'answers' are of poorer
quality, since they substitute reflexive community groupthink for
actual thought about the question.

-- Michiel

Re: StackOverflow and "Show your work"

From: andrew cooke <andrew@...>

Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 08:58:58 -0300

True; comp.lang.python is terrible for that.  It used to be a great group, but
the developers moved to python-dev, python became more popular, and it ended
up being a place to tell newbies how to do things "the python way".  Whichis
fine until you are curious about some obscure part of the language...


Comment on this post