| Andrew Cooke | Contents | Latest | RSS | Twitter | Previous | Next

C[omp]ute

Welcome to my blog, which was once a mailing list of the same name and is still generated by mail. Please reply via the "comment" links.

Always interested in offers/projects/new ideas. Eclectic experience in fields like: numerical computing; Python web; Java enterprise; functional languages; GPGPU; SQL databases; etc. Based in Santiago, Chile; telecommute worldwide. CV; email.

Personal Projects

Lepl parser for Python.

Colorless Green.

Photography around Santiago.

SVG experiment.

Professional Portfolio

Calibration of seismometers.

Data access via web services.

Cache rewrite.

Extending OpenSSH.

Last 100 entries

Flexible Muscle-Based Locomotion for Bipedal Creatures; SQL Performance Explained; The Little Manual of API Design; Multiple Word Sizes; CRC - Next Steps; FizzBuzz; Update on CRCs; Decent Links / Discussion Community; Automated Reasoning About LLVM Optimizations and Undefined Behavior; A Painless Guide To CRC Error Detection Algorithms; Tests in Julia; Dave Eggers: what's so funny about peace, love and Starship?; Cello - High Level C Programming; autoreconf needs tar; Will Self Goes To Heathrow; Top 5 BioInformatics Papers; Vasovagal Response; Good Food in Vina; Chilean Drug Criminals Use Subsitution Cipher; Adrenaline; Stiglitz on the Impact of Technology; Why Not; How I Am 5; Lenovo X240 OpenSuse 13.1; NSA and GCHQ - Psychological Trolls; Finite Fields in Julia (Defining Your Own Number Type); Julian Assange; Starting Qemu on OpenSuse; Noisy GAs/TMs; Venezuela; Reinstalling GRUB with EFI; Instructions For Disabling KDE Indexing; Evolving Speakers; Changing Salt Size in Simple Crypt 3.0.0; Logarithmic Map (Moved); More Info; Words Found in Voynich Manuscript; An Inventory Of 3D Space-Filling Curves; Foxes Using Magnetic Fields To Hunt; 5 Rounds RC5 No Rotation; JP Morgan and Madoff; Ori - Secure, Distributed File System; Physical Unclonable Functions (PUFs); Prejudice on Reddit; Recursion OK; Optimizing Julia Code; Cash Handouts in Brazil; Couple Nice Music Videos; It Also Works!; Adaptive Plaintext; It Works!; RC5 Without Rotation (2); 8 Years...; Attack Against Encrypted Linux Disks; Pushing Back On NSA At IETF; Summary of Experimental Ethics; Very Good Talk On Security, Snowden; Locusts are Grasshoppers!; Vagrant (OpenSuse and IDEs); Interesting Take On Mandela's Context; Haskell Cabal O(n^2) / O(n) Fix; How I Am 4; Chilean Charity Supporting Women; Doing SSH right; Festival of Urban Intervention; Neat Idea - Wormholes Provide Entanglement; And a Link....; Simple Encryption for Python 2.7; OpenSuse 13.1 Is Better!; Little Gain...; More Details on Technofull Damage; Palmrest Cracked Too....; Tecnofull (Lenovo Support) Is Fucking Useless; The Neuroscientist Who Discovered He Was a Psychopath; Interpolating Polynomials; Bottlehead Crack as Pre-amp; Ooops K702!; Bottlehead Crack, AKG K701; Breaking RC5 Without Rotation; Great post thank you; Big Balls of Mud; Phabricator - Tools for working together; Amazing Julia RC5 Code Parameterized By Word Size; Chi-Square Can Be Two-Sided; Why Do Brits Accept Surveillance?; Statistics Done Wrong; Mesas Trape from Bravo; European Report on Crypto Primitives and Protocols; Interesting Omissions; Oryx And Crake (Margaret Atwood); Music and Theory; My Arduino Programs; Elliptic Curve Crypto; Re: Licensing Interpreted Code; Licensing Interpreted Code; ASUS 1015E-DS03 OpenSuse 12.3 SSD; translating lettuce feature files into stub steps files; Re: translating lettuce feature files into stub steps files; A Tale of Two Psychiatrists; The Real Reason the Poor Go Without Bank Accounts; The Rational Choices of Crack Addicts

© 2006-2013 Andrew Cooke (site) / post authors (content).

Twitter Stats and Bots

From: andrew cooke <andrew@...>

Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 22:43:39 -0400

This article -
http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/07/statistical-probability-that-mitt-romneys-new-twitter-followers-are-just-normal-users-0/260539/
- is mildly interesting.

I wouldn't have bothered posting a link except that I don't understand how
they can be so confident about the results.  In particular, look compare the
two graphs and tell me which curve looks odd:

http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/science/indegree_615.jpg
http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/science/obamaindegree_615.jpg

The odd man out is the yellow/gold curve for Romney.  The other three look
vaguely similar.  Yet that is the control group!  So what this seems to show
is that Romney, Obama, and other people as popular as Obama have a certain
shape; and that other people as popular as Romney have a different shape.

And when you put it like that, a mechanism seems pretty obvious:

Obama is very well known.  People in his control group are also well known.
Well known people have a certain shape (peaked to the left).

People like Romney are not well known and have a different shape (peaked
centrally).

One explanation for this is that bots follow the most well known people (but
that's not important for what I am arguing here).

So there are two sets of people, with different curves: well known and
not-so-well-known.

And then we have Romney.  Who has recently become very well known.  He has had
a lot of press coverage.  And so might be attracting followers distributed
like Obama, but who is still early enough in the game to have a total number
of votes comparable to less popular people.

I thought this was obvious, but am having a hard time making clear what I
mean...

Basically, Romney is being mis-identified as belonging to the less-popular
group because he has few followers.  But in fact he is an early stage version
of the popular group.  From that perspective he should have a similar profile
to Obama, but with a reduced scale (similar distribution but fewer total
followers).


One more time:

There's no ab-initio reason for shape to follow total number, which is what
the analysis assumes.  Perhaps Romney is simple a scaled down Obama (scaled
down because he only recently became very famous), rather than comparable to
less popular people that happen to have the same number of followers (people
who have a different kind of follower profile, with a different shape curve,
and which only happen to have a similar number of followers to Romney by
chance).

I hope that was clear to someone!

Andrew

Comment on this post