| Andrew Cooke | Contents | Latest | RSS | Twitter | Previous | Next

C[omp]ute

Welcome to my blog, which was once a mailing list of the same name and is still generated by mail. Please reply via the "comment" links.

Always interested in offers/projects/new ideas. Eclectic experience in fields like: numerical computing; Python web; Java enterprise; functional languages; GPGPU; SQL databases; etc. Based in Santiago, Chile; telecommute worldwide. CV; email.

Personal Projects

Lepl parser for Python.

Colorless Green.

Photography around Santiago.

SVG experiment.

Professional Portfolio

Calibration of seismometers.

Data access via web services.

Cache rewrite.

Extending OpenSSH.

C-ORM: docs, API.

Last 100 entries

Crypto AG DID work with NSA / GCHQ; UNUMS (Universal Number Format); MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses); Interesting Looking Game; Euler's Theorem for Polynomials; Weeks 3-6; Reddit Comment; Differential Cryptanalysis For Dummies; Japanese Graphic Design; Books To Be Re-Read; And Today I Learned Bugs Need Clear Examples; Factoring a 67 bit prime in your head; Islamic Geometric Art; Useful Julia Backtraces from Tasks; Nothing, however, is lost with less discomfort than that which, when lost, cannot be missed; Article on Didion; Cost of Living by City; British Slavery; Derrida on Metaphor; African SciFi; Traits in Julia; Alternative Japanese Lit; Pulic Key as Address (Snow); Why Information Grows; The Blindness Of The Chilean Elite; Some Victoriagate Links; This Is Why I Left StackOverflow; New TLS Implementation; Maths for Physicists; How I Am 8; 1000 Word Philosophy; Cyberpunk Reading List; Detailed Discussion of Message Dispatch in ParserCombinator Library for Julia; FizzBuzz in Julia w Dependent Types; kokko - Design Shop in Osaka; Summary of Greece, Currently; LLVM and GPUs; See Also; Schoolgirl Groyps (Maths); Japanese Lit; Another Example - Modular Arithmetic; Music from United; Python 2 and 3 compatible alternative.; Read Agatha Christie for the Plot; A Constructive Look at TempleOS; Music Thread w Many Recommendations; Fixed Version; A Useful Julia Macro To Define Equality And Hash; k3b cdrom access, OpenSuse 13.1; Week 2; From outside, the UK looks less than stellar; Huge Fonts in VirtualBox; Keen - Complex Emergencies; The Fallen of World War II; Some Spanish Fiction; Calling C From Fortran 95; Bjork DJ Set; Z3 Example With Python; Week 1; Useful Guide To Starting With IJulia; UK Election + Media; Review: Reinventing Organizations; Inline Assembly With Julia / LLVM; Against the definition of types; Dumb Crypto Paper; The Search For Quasi-Periodicity...; Is There An Alternative To Processing?; CARDIAC (CARDboard Illustrative Aid to Computation); The Bolivian Case Against Chile At The Hague; Clear, Cogent Economic Arguments For Immigration; A Program To Say If I Am Working; Decent Cards For Ill People; New Photo; Luksic And Barrick Gold; President Bachelet's Speech; Baltimore Primer; libxml2 Parsing Stream; configure.ac Recipe For Library Path; The Davalos Affair For Idiots; Not The Onion: Google Fireside Chat w Kissinger; Bicycle Wheels, Inertia, and Energy; Another Tax Fraud; Google's Borg; A Verion That Redirects To Local HTTP Server; Spanish Accents For Idiots; Aluminium Cans; Advice on Spray Painting; Female View of Online Chat From a Male; UX Reading List; S4 Subgroups - Geometric Interpretation; Fucking Email; The SQM Affair For Idiots; Using Kolmogorov Complexity; Oblique Strategies in bash; Curses Tools; Markov Chain Monte Carlo Without all the Bullshit; Email Para Matias Godoy Mercado; The Penta Affair For Idiots; Example Code To Create numpy Array in C; Good Article on Bias in Graphic Design (NYTimes); Do You Backup github?

© 2006-2015 Andrew Cooke (site) / post authors (content).

Angular Momentum, Differential Equations

From: "andrew cooke" <andrew@...>

Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:44:21 -0300 (CLST)

A while back, on AskMe, someone asked aboutthe behaviour of the following
physical system:

 Two points, of equal mass, are stationary in an otherwise empty universe.
 They are attracted to each other via gravity.

Now to solve this directly you know that acceleration is proportional to
gravity and so inversely proportional to the separation.  And you end up
with something like
  x'' = -k / x^2
Which is rather nasty to solve (something like a tan substitution?).

Now vacapinta observed that the system is the "usual" gravitational two
body problem, so the time before the two objects collide (which was
requested by the original poster) was half the period given by Kepler's
equations.

A bit of a recap on the two body problem: it reduces to the classical
single body problem (eg planet in orbit around much more massive star)
with a simple transformation (centre of mass, major axis etc).

This made my brain explode.  Because solving the single body problem is
easy.  Yet I just said that solving the problem above was hard.

Why is the single body problem easy?  Indirectly, because angular momentum
is not zero.  So the particle always misses the centre, avoiding the nasty
infinities you get with the two points described above (lim 1/x^2 as x ->
infinity).

Another way of looking at this is to see that you get simple harmonic
motion (or something very like it; I haven't looked in detail) when you
resolve along the x/y axes.  This is because when x=0, y is non-zero and
the force is perpendicular to the x axis.

That also helps show why angular momentum doesn't affect the period of the
orbit - because it's "orthogonal" to the forces involved.

So by introducing angular momentum into the problem I first described you
end up with a system that is simpler, mathematically.  You can then look
at the limit as the angular momentum tends to zero to see the solution for
the original system.

This seems very odd to me.

And a final comment - if you think about this in terms of Lagrangians
(which I was never taught, despite having a degree in physics from
Cambridge - something that seems *very* odd in retrospect) then you get a
path integral (I think).  Now is there some relationship between this and
all that fuss about poles in the complex plane and path integrals that go
around them?  I wish I could remember all that stuff....

Andrew

Mach

From: "andrew cooke" <andrew@...>

Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:49:29 -0300 (CLST)

In an otherwise empty universe two points may not have angular momentum,
right?

(Also, replies should now appear "instantly")

Comment on this post